No Modular Power Supplies
Browse 360 No modular units with full specs.
Sort 1
Sort 2
Sort 3
Showing 360 of 360 entries in No modular
Brand
Series
Wattages
Tier
Year
Size
ATX Ver.
Input
Modular
Eff.
Topology
ODM
Platform
↪ Notes: 5 year warranty, OCP is set way higher than necessary on the minor rails.
↪ Notes: Insane 7 year warranty given the component quality, OCP is set way higher than necessary on the minor rails, very poor 200% excursion response.
↪ Notes: APFC - no 80 Plus or Cybenetics rating
↪ Notes: OCP is not claimed on any rail (although it most likely exists for the minor rails only), very low +12V line output relative to total capacity.
↪ Notes: Although OCP is set reasonably (118% on 12V), the platform is at its limit and cannot handle the increased stress, as ripple gets out of control.
↪ Notes: PPFC - no 80 Plus or Cybenetics rating
↪ Notes: ODM is Guangzhou PREE Electronic Technology Co. Ltd.
↪ Notes: Qualified for 80+ Silver in testing
↪ Notes: Cybenetics Silver
↪ Notes: ODM is Dongguan Changhu Electronics Co. Ltd.
↪ Notes: 650W is technically rated Cybenetics Silver
↪ Notes: 750W is technically rated Cybenetics Silver
↪ Notes: No OTP claimed
↪ Notes: Pro and Pro RGB Modular are the same internally.
↪ Notes: 1000W model might be DC-DC, unable to confirm without a proper teardown
↪ Notes: 1000W model might be DC-DC, unable to confirm without a proper teardown
↪ Notes: PPFC on 650W models and below. "Specifications are subject to change at any time without notice."
↪ Notes: PPFC on 650W models and below. "Specifications are subject to change at any time without notice."
↪ Notes: "Full Range" version is equally as bad according to the claimed specs.
↪ Notes: Improperly set OCP allows for abysmal voltage drops past ATX spec.
↪ Notes: No transient response testing found.
↪ Notes: Sleeve-bearing fan.
Cuprum Strike (CSK) "DC"
DC-DC
XWY
A11 (HKC ATX-41B clone)
↪ Notes: DC-DC variant of the CSK Bronze; only 750W has 300W 12VHPWR.
↪ Notes: No inrush protection. Sold in the US as Earthwatts Green. 650W utilizes 105C secondary caps, 550W 85C.
Cuprum Strike (CSK) Bronze
GR
Hui Cheng
~Zalman Megamax V2
↪ Notes: Also known as CSK[w]H. Not printed on the logos.
↪ Notes: X8 might be a clone of CWT's GPK platform, but is similar to the M5 platform (not very good.)
↪ Notes: No 80 Plus or Cybenetics rating, OCP is not claimed on any rail, poor 12V output relative to total capacity, poor quality fan, etc. Basically e-waste.
↪ Notes: Be wary that more variants of the Prestige are made! Same platform as Xigmatek Hydra M.
↪ Notes: Very low build quality, basically e-waste
↪ Notes: Group regulated; effective capacity is 10% lower than advertised based on +12V current rating
↪ Notes: Mediocre transient response and low quality caps.
↪ Notes: 2 year warranty. PSAZ Bronze w/ARGB fan. 540W, 648W, & 744W on 12V respectively.
↪ Notes: Cost-down full input new PSAZ Bronze w/ ARGB fan.
↪ Notes: 2 year warranty. 550W: 540W on 12V, 650W: 648W on 12V, 750W: 744W on 12V.
↪ Notes: Cost-down full input new PSAZ Bronze.
↪ Notes: 2 year warranty; platform is otherwise reasonably capable.
↪ Notes: 2 year warranty. PSAZ Bronze w/ARGB fan. 550W: 492W, 650W: 576W on 12V.
↪ Notes: 2 year warranty. 650W: 576W on 12v.
↪ Notes: Non modular variant of the Pure Power 10 CM, virtually identical.
↪ Notes: Low quality fan, 85C bulk cap.
↪ Notes: Terrible ripple suppression, especially on 12V (well over 100mV under full load), OCP is not set properly, low efficiency, low quality fan.
↪ Notes: Looks exactly the same as the regular System Power 10 internally. Unless later testing proves the above issues are not present, detier to E.
↪ Notes: Design modified for multiple 12V rails: 3 on ≤550W, 4 on ≥650W
↪ Notes: Good build and component quality, with good ripple suppression and a decent noise profile. Notably, Aris received a PPG-C sample with a higher capacitance bulk capacitor, different from what other reviews had. PPG-C and PPG-S are identical aside from modularity.
↪ Notes: Sleeve bearing fan, during OPP testing at around 30% of the 500W model do the minor rail falls out of ATX specification.
↪ Notes: 3 year warranty; 85C bulk cap, and not one of particularly good quality, either.
↪ Notes: Voltage regulation is out of ATX specifications on the minor rails; also not independently regulated.
↪ Notes: "85% 230V only", ketchup and mustard cables. Outdated and no official 80+ certification, only on the tier list since it's still on their website.
↪ Notes: "85% 230V only", ketchup and mustard cables. Outdated and no official 80+ certification, only on the tier list since it's still on their website.
↪ Notes: "85% 230V only", ketchup and mustard cables. Outdated and no official 80+ certification, only on the tier list since it's still on their website.
↪ Notes: Yellow on black label; no 80+ certification and aging. Not certain on topology but not recommendable regardless. See review here. No OCP.
↪ Notes: Blue label. No OCP.
↪ Notes: "85% 230V only", ketchup and mustard cables, not independently regulated. Doesn't have OCP according to this review.
↪ Notes: Fake 80+ 230V only certification label, ketchup and mustard cables, not independently regulated. White label. No OCP.
↪ Notes: Fake 85% efficiency label, black on yellow label; it's also old. Not certain on topology but not recommendable regardless. See review here. No OCP.
↪ Notes: Platform is essentially a modified MWE Bronze V3.
MWE V3 ATX 3.1 Bronze -
DC-DC
Gospower
G1208 upd. to ATX 3.1
↪ Notes: Basically G1208 updated to ATX 3.1
MWE V3 ATX 3.1 Gold Non-Mod.
DC-DC
Gospower
G1208 mod. upd. to ATX 3.1
↪ Notes: Modified MWE Bronze V3, same as G Gold V2.
MWE V3 ATX 3.1 Gold Non-Mod.
DC-DC
Gospower
G1208 mod. upd. to ATX 3.1
↪ Notes: Modified MWE Bronze V3, same as G Gold V2.
↪ Notes: Same as MWE Gold non-modular
MWE V3 ATX 3.1 Bronze 230V
DC-DC
Gospower
G1208 upd. to ATX 3.1
↪ Notes: Basically G1208 updated to ATX 3.1, no 12VHPWR.
MWE V3 ATX 3.1 Bronze 230V
DC-DC
Gospower
G1208 upd. to ATX 3.1
↪ Notes: Basically G1208 updated to ATX 3.1; broke during 5V SCP. Possible bad sample? No 12VHPWR.
↪ Notes: Basically Elite V4 but full range
↪ Notes: Complete e-waste. Extremely poor build and component quality all around.
↪ Notes: Black "CX" lettering on gray label; Double-sourced between GW & CWT; technically qualified for 80+ Silver but badged as Bronze.
CX
(Non-Modular) 2016 (Gray Label)
DC-DC
Great Wall
modified GW-ATXBL
↪ Notes: Black "CX" lettering on gray label; Double-sourced between GW & CWT; technically qualified for 80+ Silver but badged as Bronze.
↪ Notes: White "CX" lettering on black label; Identical to the CV aside from exterior design.
↪ Notes: Green "CX" lettering on black label. Detiered to C- due to age.
↪ Notes: White "CX" lettering on black label; Identical to the CV aside from exterior design.
↪ Notes: Green "CX" lettering on black label. 85C caps all around, 30C rated operating temp, avoid.
↪ Notes: Grey label; OCP doesn't work properly, allowing the voltages to fall out of spec, very poor ripple suppression on 5V, failed transient testing on 3.3V
↪ Notes: Mediocre quality capacitors.
↪ Notes: OEM and platform is unconfirmed, unit is basically e-waste though.
↪ Notes: Protections are found to be working in GPW based units in similar or identical configurations.
↪ Notes: Can come in white variants. Protections need tuning. ATX 3.0 refresh of the PM-D.
↪ Notes: Internals appear to be variable based on region/batch.
↪ Notes: Subpar component quality, with highly set protections and OOS 3.3V transient response.
↪ Notes: Low component quality, w/ highly set OCP/OPP & OOS 3.3V transient response. Not quite ATX 3.X by failing low load efficiency. 600W 12+2 cable.
↪ Notes: Subpar component quality, with poorly tuned protections, 5V OCP incorrectly set allows for >135mV of ripple. OOS 3.3V transient response.
↪ Notes: Doesn't claim necessary protections, unknown components.
↪ Notes: Net graded to Tier E due to it being group regulated.
↪ Notes: Doesn't claim necessary protections, unknown components.
↪ Notes: Extremely low 12V line output relative to total claimed capacity, basically only a 350W PSU; no 80+ or Cybenetics rating.
↪ Notes: Good electrical performance for the category, decent component quality, protections are set reasonably.
↪ Notes: Supremo Gold made for non-modularity. No OCP to be found in testing nor claimed.
↪ Notes: ATX 3.1 is claimed, but the unit fails to meet the spec due to poor ATX 3.1 excursion response. Treat as ATX 2.x.
↪ Notes: See notes under Series name for how to identify each version.
↪ Notes: See notes under Series name for how to identify each version.
↪ Notes: See notes under Series name for how to identify each version.
↪ Notes: See notes under Series name for how to identify each version.
↪ Notes: See notes under Series name for how to identify each version.
↪ Notes: No OCP on 12V. High RMA rate due to MLCC cracks, similar to other HEC-built EVGA PSUs
↪ Notes: Platform is an old Super Flower design, but is actually produced by RSY.
↪ Notes: PPFC, e-waste, only rated for a continuous operating temperature of 25C.
↪ Notes: Malfunctioning safety protections that cause the unit to experience catastrophic failure and blow up. Fire hazard.
↪ Notes: Malfunctioning safety protections (OCP/OPP) allowing for OOS operation and catastrophic failure, 20AWG PCIe.
↪ Notes: No performance data although the platform is decently reviewed.
↪ Notes: Not enough extensive testing.
↪ Notes: Initial batches of the unit were shipped without the OCP chip, supposedly newer batches have this new fuse chip but yet confirmed.
↪ Notes: Lacks protections, not independently regulated.
↪ Notes: Doesn't claim certain protections, old outdated platform.
↪ Notes: Traditional thin circular fan grille.
↪ Notes: Uses hexagonal (in a circular shape) and oblong fan grilles.
↪ Notes: Falsely claimed Cybenetics Gold certification, units were never tested.
↪ Notes: Falsely claimed Cybenetics Gold certification, units were never tested.
↪ Notes: PPFC, extremely poor build quality and component quality; e-waste.
↪ Notes: PPFC, extremely poor build quality and component quality; e-waste.
↪ Notes: The OCP triggering points on the minor rails should be reduced. Some components, especially on the secondary side, are of questionable quality.
↪ Notes: Costdown NO-817. 85c bulk cap.
↪ Notes: Sometimes referred to as the "Super Gold", OEM Performance GD.
↪ Notes: Costdown of the Thermaltake Toughpower GF3 ARGB platform; non-modular with Chinese caps and a rifle bearing fan.
↪ Notes: Simplicity HPG, just with a red LED 120mm fan.
↪ Notes: Naming scheme is +50W from the advertised 12V wattage. Numerous minor issues, very loud, and OCP is set way too high on the minor rails.
↪ Notes: Doesn't claim necessary protections. No real 80+ certification label on the unit.
↪ Notes: OCP on both the 3.3V and 5V lines is either faulty or set in excess of 330%, which is unacceptable. Bad electrical performance (severely OOS).
↪ Notes: Same design as the OEM HP1-J-GD-F12S with a rifle bearing fan.
↪ Notes: 500W variant's +12V output is rated for 480W. Rifle-bearing fan (PY-1225M12S)
↪ Notes: Included with the InWin A1 Plus case; not available on its own.
↪ Notes: Actual +12V capacity is ~5-10% lower than advertised wattage.
↪ Notes: Actual 12V line output is 50 watts less than the model name (despite being DC-DC), numerous minute issues; overall suboptimal quality.
↪ Notes: Extremely low 12V line output relative to total capacity. The "1000W" model has only 750W available to the +12V line.
↪ Notes: Extremely low 12V line output relative to total capacity. The "1000W" model has only 750W available to the +12V line.
↪ Notes: Platform confirmed through overhead and internal shots provided by the manufacturer.
↪ Notes: SI model, however it appears to be identical to the MP-B.
↪ Notes: Platform is GPN (or at least very similar), even though the model number indicates it to be GPK.
↪ Notes: OTP isn't claimed despite the fact that the supervisor IC might support it
↪ Notes: OTP isn't claimed despite the fact that the supervisor IC might support it, nearly identical internally to the original Gamma
↪ Notes: Either dual sourced or XWY replaced HKC.
↪ Notes: Either dual sourced or XWY replaced HKC.
↪ Notes: Components are variable based on batch.
↪ Notes: Components are variable based on batch.
↪ Notes: A-BN with 300W 12VHPWR connection. Claims sleeve bearing, unknown quality fan.. Does not claim ATX 3.0 compliance.
↪ Notes: Single-rail. See review. Poor transient response on 3.3V, rifle bearing fan. OTP isn't claimed or tested, but is supported by the supervisor IC.
↪ Notes: 3 year warranty, inconclusive on platform until further notice.
↪ Notes: 130mV+ of ripple on all rails (out of spec) at only 60% load; failed to meet even 80+ Bronze. See Rear Shot and Output Specification Label.
↪ Notes: No OCP, faulty UVP on 3.3V, bad electrical performance.
↪ Notes: Terrible electrical performance under crossloads (effect of Group Regulation), and overall poor performance otherwise.
↪ Notes: 500W seemingly still manufactured according to MC stock.
↪ Notes: Still produced according to MC stock
↪ Notes: Some degree of false advertising going on. Claims to be LLC resonant with an FDB fan and 105C caps. Internal shots show otherwise. Recommended to proceed with caution. Even though the platform is safe, it's not as good as advertised.
↪ Notes: Some degree of false advertising going on. Claims to be LLC resonant with an FDB fan and 105C caps. Internal shots show otherwise. Recommended to proceed with caution. Even though the platform is safe, it's not as good as advertised.
↪ Notes: Low quality sleeve bearing fan, ripple exceeds ATX specification, low quality capacitors, and a 3 year warranty.
↪ Notes: Platform was swapped from ATX-0600 to ATX-0200 sometime around 2024. No way to tell the original from the swap. Avoid.
↪ Notes: PPFC; bundled with select Rosewill cases.
↪ Notes: Internal shots confirm a costdown Core GC/Focus
↪ Notes: Costdown of the G12 GC; cheaper components, all Chinese caps, and an even cheaper fan; downgraded to Bronze eff.
↪ Notes: GX but non-modular
↪ Notes: OTP isn't claimed, IC doesn't support it either
↪ Notes: Claims only SCP, OPP, and over/under voltage. OCP not claimed on any rail.
↪ Notes: Not recommended since no proper testing exists, and numerous issues exist with other Segotep units that were tested.
↪ Notes: Lacks proper OCP. Allows for huge voltage drops out of ATX spec resulting in UVP kicking in.
↪ Notes: Lacks proper OCP. Allows for huge voltage drops out of ATX spec resulting in UVP kicking in.
↪ Notes: Relatively loud at over 40dbA at full load. Rifle bearing fan.
↪ Notes: Middling load regulation for the 3.3v & 5VSB rails, 5 year warranty.
↪ Notes: OCP triggering points on the 5V and 5VSB rails allow for excessive ripple beyond the ATX specification. 5 year warranty.
↪ Notes: EU/JP only? No stated manufacturer warranty outside of mandated EU 2 year warranty.
↪ Notes: Claims an ICB fan, actually uses an LLS (rifle) bearing. Extremely loud, in excess of 45dBA under full load.
↪ Notes: Claims an ICB fan, Aris showed a rifle bearing. OPP set high (~150%,) OOS 3.3V transients. Noisy (>50dBA@750W load). Dual EPS on 18AWG cable.
↪ Notes: Protechnic Electric sleeve bearing fan.
↪ Notes: Rebrand of the ST-ES 230V
↪ Notes: Actual 12V capacity is 456W. Does not claim OTP. ARGB fan controlled via motherboard header. Hong Hua rifle bearing fan.
↪ Notes: Actual 12V capacity is 456W. Does not claim OTP nor OCP. Assumed to be similar to ET500-ARGB.
↪ Notes: Does not claim OCP on any rails. Minimal information available.
↪ Notes: No OTP and OCP (12V) present; low hold-up time (out of spec); poor soldering quality.
↪ Notes: Sleeve-bearing fan. OCP untested.
↪ Notes: OCP doesn't work properly on +12V, unit experiences a huge voltage drop to 10.92V on +12V. Avoid until further testing.
↪ Notes: Costdown GX1 with 85C Chinese caps and a sleeve bearing Yate Loon fan; intended for OEM/SI market.
↪ Notes: While a functional platform, the other two "known" 750W variants are unidentifiable.
↪ Notes: DC-DC, but 12V capacity is rated awfully low, at what a GR would typically be (672W or 56A).
↪ Notes: Poor thermal management; fan has to work very hard to prevent OTP from kicking in. Can get as loud as ~60dbA (!) under high operating temps.
↪ Notes: Be wary of 2024 CE-Link variant! GX1 costdown. If CWT based, 588W on 12V output for 600W.
↪ Notes: 3 separate versions dependent upon region, most groupreg. Also a 230V only version. Essentially unrecommendable due to platform variation.
↪ Notes: Under crossload, 5V rail experiences high ripple >100mV, doubling ATX spec.
↪ Notes: Unknown number of suppliers. Missing crucial safety protections, very old platforms and very poor build quality.
↪ Notes: Very poor build quality and unknown number of suppliers, crucial protections not claimed.
↪ Notes: Black casing, white sticker. Unknown number of suppliers for this unit. Versions that have been tested have malfunctioning OCP, OPP, and SCP.
↪ Notes: Missing crucial safety protections, very old platform and very poor build quality.
↪ Notes: Claims LLC resonant, internal shots show otherwise. Parts selection is very questionable and transient response on the minor rails failed.
↪ Notes: Presumably the modular variant of the Thor V3.
↪ Notes: Poor electrical performance from an unknown OEM; fails all 12V transient response testing per F14 Lab's testing.
↪ Notes: Poor electrical performance from an unknown OEM; fails all 12V transient response testing per F14 Lab's testing.
↪ Notes: No OCP, and OVP/UVP is set too high to be effective. Also really only a 600W unit despite being advertised as 750.
↪ Notes: Failed ATX 3.0 power excursion, protections, and 12V transient response. Low-quality components.
↪ Notes: No MOV. OCP on the 3.3V rail failed (via rails falling out of ATX specification)
↪ Notes: Not independently regulated and no 80+ or Cybenetics certification
↪ Notes: Claims to be DC-DC, but internal shots show otherwise; false advertising.
↪ Notes: PPFC and no 80+ certification; e-waste
↪ Notes: Does not claim certain safety protection circuits which is a major deficiency.
↪ Notes: Claimed DC-DC, internal shots from 2023 show otherwise. Confirmed GR.
↪ Notes: Pre production sample used for testing.
↪ Notes: No protections testing, performance testing is not extensive. Need further testing to move beyond tier E since Jiumeng is the OEM.
↪ Notes: PPFC; e-waste, same as the 83+ XE