Tier E Power Supplies
Browse 182 tier E units with full specs and sorting.
Search through power supply units by various criteria including brand, wattage, tier, topology, ODM, and more
Showing 75 of 182 entries in Tier E
↪ Notes: APFC - no 80 Plus or Cybenetics rating
↪ Notes: OCP is not claimed on any rail (although it most likely exists for the minor rails only), very low +12V line output relative to total capacity.
↪ Notes: Although OCP is set reasonably (118% on 12V), the platform is at its limit and cannot handle the increased stress, as ripple gets out of control.
↪ Notes: Shares the same layout as the Lian Li SP850, which, due to its capacity and layout, had a potential fire risk under 100VAC input.
↪ Notes: 5VSB has >60mV of ripple in crossloads and OCP is poorly tuned, with high ripple for all rails.
↪ Notes: 12VHPWR cable, unknown quality fan (likely sleeve bearing), no claimed OTP. Only teardowns proving platform.
↪ Notes: Pro and Pro RGB Modular are the same internally.
↪ Notes: 1000W model might be DC-DC, unable to confirm without a proper teardown
↪ Notes: 1000W model might be DC-DC, unable to confirm without a proper teardown
↪ Notes: 1000W model might be DC-DC, unable to confirm without a proper teardown
↪ Notes: 1000W model might be DC-DC, unable to confirm without a proper teardown
↪ Notes: Overall very low build quality
↪ Notes: Double-sourced between HEC and Andyson
↪ Notes: Double-sourced between HEC and Andyson
↪ Notes: Also known as CSK[w]H. Not printed on the logos.
↪ Notes: Most likely for the Asian market; sightings in China and India. Ketchup and mustard cables, different fan grille, label, and box.
↪ Notes: X8 might be a clone of CWT's GPK platform, but is similar to the M5 platform (not very good.)
↪ Notes: X8 might be a clone of CWT's GPK platform, but is similar to the M5 platform (not very good.)
↪ Notes: Very low build quality, basically e-waste
↪ Notes: Group regulated; effective capacity is 10% lower than advertised based on +12V current rating
All PSUs
Wattages
Year
—
Size
—
ATX
—
Input
—
Modular
—
Efficiency
—
Topology
—
ODM
Solytech
Platform
↪ Notes: Very low overall performance and poor quality control leading to extremely inconsistent results, even on their high-end models. Lower-end models are untested and should also be avoided unless professional reviews are released.
All PSUs
Wattages
Year
—
Size
—
ATX
—
Input
—
Modular
—
Efficiency
—
Topology
—
ODM
Solytech
Platform
↪ Notes: Very low overall performance and poor quality control leading to extremely inconsistent results, even on their high-end models. Lower-end models are untested and should also be avoided unless professional reviews are released.
All PSUs
Wattages
Year
—
Size
—
ATX
—
Input
—
Modular
—
Efficiency
—
Topology
—
ODM
Solytech
Platform
↪ Notes: Very low overall performance and poor quality control leading to extremely inconsistent results, even on their high-end models. Lower-end models are untested and should also be avoided unless professional reviews are released.
All PSUs
Wattages
Year
—
Size
—
ATX
—
Input
—
Modular
—
Efficiency
—
Topology
—
ODM
Solytech
Platform
↪ Notes: Very low overall performance and poor quality control leading to extremely inconsistent results, even on their high-end models. Lower-end models are untested and should also be avoided unless professional reviews are released.
All PSUs
Wattages
Year
—
Size
—
ATX
—
Input
—
Modular
—
Efficiency
—
Topology
—
ODM
Solytech
Platform
↪ Notes: Very low overall performance and poor quality control leading to extremely inconsistent results, even on their high-end models. Lower-end models are untested and should also be avoided unless professional reviews are released.
All PSUs
Wattages
Year
—
Size
—
ATX
—
Input
—
Modular
—
Efficiency
—
Topology
—
ODM
Jiumeng
Platform
↪ Notes: Fraudulent business practices and review manipulation. Testing from multiple sources has shown performance to be significantly lower than average. Fake 80+ certifications. Significant platform downgrades with the same model number and no difference in branding prevent review data from being useful for making recommendations. Tier E should be considered an upper bound for recommendations; certain models such as the AGV qualify for tier F.
All PSUs
Wattages
Year
—
Size
—
ATX
—
Input
—
Modular
—
Efficiency
—
Topology
—
ODM
Jiumeng
Platform
↪ Notes: Fraudulent business practices and review manipulation. Testing from multiple sources has shown performance to be significantly lower than average. Fake 80+ certifications. Significant platform downgrades with the same model number and no difference in branding prevent review data from being useful for making recommendations. Tier E should be considered an upper bound for recommendations; certain models such as the AGV qualify for tier F.
All PSUs
Wattages
Year
—
Size
—
ATX
—
Input
—
Modular
—
Efficiency
—
Topology
—
ODM
Jiumeng
Platform
↪ Notes: Fraudulent business practices and review manipulation. Testing from multiple sources has shown performance to be significantly lower than average. Fake 80+ certifications. Significant platform downgrades with the same model number and no difference in branding prevent review data from being useful for making recommendations. Tier E should be considered an upper bound for recommendations; certain models such as the AGV qualify for tier F.
All PSUs
Wattages
Year
—
Size
—
ATX
—
Input
—
Modular
—
Efficiency
—
Topology
—
ODM
Jiumeng
Platform
↪ Notes: Fraudulent business practices and review manipulation. Testing from multiple sources has shown performance to be significantly lower than average. Fake 80+ certifications. Significant platform downgrades with the same model number and no difference in branding prevent review data from being useful for making recommendations. Tier E should be considered an upper bound for recommendations; certain models such as the AGV qualify for tier F.
↪ Notes: 2 year warranty. PSAZ Bronze w/ARGB fan. 550W: 492W, 650W: 576W on 12V.
↪ Notes: 2 year warranty. 650W: 576W on 12v.
↪ Notes: Terrible ripple suppression, especially on 12V (well over 100mV under full load), OCP is not set properly, low efficiency, low quality fan.
↪ Notes: Looks exactly the same as the regular System Power 10 internally. Unless later testing proves the above issues are not present, detier to E.
↪ Notes: Voltage regulation is out of ATX specifications on the minor rails; also not independently regulated.
↪ Notes: "85% 230V only", ketchup and mustard cables. Outdated and no official 80+ certification, only on the tier list since it's still on their website.
↪ Notes: "85% 230V only", ketchup and mustard cables. Outdated and no official 80+ certification, only on the tier list since it's still on their website.
↪ Notes: "85% 230V only", ketchup and mustard cables. Outdated and no official 80+ certification, only on the tier list since it's still on their website.
↪ Notes: Electrical performance is decent (although no transient response data) but simply not recommendable due to age.
↪ Notes: "85% 230V only", ketchup and mustard cables. Outdated and no official 80+ certification, only on the tier list since it's still on their website.
↪ Notes: Only basic voltage regulation and ripple data found here. Not recommendable due to age; only kept for legacy purposes (still on website.)
↪ Notes: Not 100% sure on platform
↪ Notes: Basically Elite V4 but full range
↪ Notes: Green "CX" lettering on black label. 85C caps all around, 30C rated operating temp, avoid.
↪ Notes: Green "CX" lettering on black label. 85C caps all around, 30C rated operating temp, avoid.
↪ Notes: Grey label; OCP doesn't work properly, allowing the voltages to fall out of spec, very poor ripple suppression on 5V, failed transient testing on 3.3V