2022 Power Supplies

↪ Notes: Shares the same layout as the Lian Li SP850, which, due to its capacity and layout, had a potential fire risk under 100VAC input.

↪ Notes: Semi-digital

↪ Notes: No OTP claimed

↪ Notes: No OTP claimed

↪ Notes: "Full Range" version is equally as bad according to the claimed specs.

↪ Notes: Improperly set OCP allows for abysmal voltage drops past ATX spec.

↪ Notes: Not to be confused with the Xigmatek Loki.

↪ Notes: OPP is set way higher than necessary and isn't reduced even under high operating temperatures. Very poor 200% excursion response.

↪ Notes: Mediocre transient response and low quality caps.

↪ Notes: Terrible ripple suppression, especially on 12V (well over 100mV under full load), OCP is not set properly, low efficiency, low quality fan.

↪ Notes: Same platform as SilverStone HELA 2050 Platinum.

↪ Notes: 230V input only

↪ Notes: Black label, triangle fan grille. Digital monitoring and semi-passive operation controlled via USB-C connector in software.

↪ Notes: Black label, triangle fan grille. Digital monitoring and semi-passive operation controlled via USB-C connector in software.

↪ Notes: 750/850W: 140mm, 1000/1200W: 150mm. 2023 version includes 12VHPWR cable. Early reports of coil whine and premature failures/DOAs, but supposedly fixed.

↪ Notes: Internals appear to be variable based on region/batch.

↪ Notes: Doesn't claim necessary protections, unknown components such as the capacitors.

↪ Notes: See notes under Series name for how to identify each version.

↪ Notes: See notes under Series name for how to identify each version.

↪ Notes: Poor transient response on 3.3V.

↪ Notes: No OCP on 12V. High RMA rate due to MLCC cracks, similar to other HEC-built EVGA PSUs

↪ Notes: Fundamentally a Hydro G refresh. OTP isn't tested but platform is well reviewed with OTP working in similar configurations.

↪ Notes: Traditional thin circular fan grille.

↪ Notes: Updated version of the P-GM. Decent overall performance, but component quality leaves a bit to be desired (especially the fan.)

↪ Notes: The OCP triggering points on the minor rails should be reduced. Some components, especially on the secondary side, are of questionable quality.

↪ Notes: Numerous minor issues, failed ATX 3.0 transient response testing, poor build quality.

↪ Notes: Malfunctioning OCP on 3.3V, and transient response on 3.3V is out of spec, questionable choices of components.

↪ Notes: Fatal design flaw that causes an X cap to melt under 100VAC; potential fire hazard. Two samples also died during LTT Labs testing.

↪ Notes: Either dual sourced or XWY replaced HKC.

↪ Notes: ATX 3.0 refresh

↪ Notes: Interleaved PFC, semi-digital

↪ Notes: Fan grille without island about the fan hub. 140mm fan

↪ Notes: White 750W available.

↪ Notes: Low quality sleeve bearing fan, ripple exceeds ATX specification, low quality capacitors, and a 3 year warranty.

↪ Notes: Semi-digital, Razer Chroma integration with other Razer products.

↪ Notes: ATX 3.0 transient response could be better. 5VSB OCP is stupidly high.

↪ Notes: 5VSB OCP is stupidly high.

↪ Notes: GX but non-modular

↪ Notes: GX but semi-modular

↪ Notes: Sleeve bearing fan, 3.3V rail is subpar in transient testing, fan profile is aggressive and very loud when pushed. Source: Aris

↪ Notes: Two samples (same platform) no longer operated after protections testing per LTT Labs, which is not ideal, but all protections did function.

↪ Notes: Rebrand of the ST-ES 230V

↪ Notes: Hold-up time fails to meet the ATX minimum specification.

↪ Notes: Poorly tuned OCP triggering points and 20 gauge wire for the far-end PCIe connectors. Treat capacity as ~100W lower than advertised.

↪ Notes: Unusually tight OCP triggering points and 20 gauge wire for the far-end PCIe connectors. Treat capacity as ~100W lower than advertised.

↪ Notes: OCP is set much higher than necessary on all rails.

↪ Notes: Poor electrical performance from an unknown OEM; fails all 12V transient response testing per F14 Lab's testing.